Saturday, February 22, 2014

MONSTERS.

 Monsters and things. Things one cannot talk about. Things that go bump in the night.

Well, in that case, I may as well keep my thoughts to myself for now. One day, to tell.


Truly, it's the twilight zone. I'll need to get my thoughts together in order to describe just what I've discovered, what I've found. So much, so very much.


To give you some idea of what I am talking about.... here is an excerpt from the book:

ALIEN INTERVIEW. Based On Personal Notes & Interview Transcriptions Provided by Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy. -- by Lawrence R. Spencer


Preamble


What greater brutality can be inflicted on anyone than to erase or

deny the spiritual awareness, identity,

ability, and memory that is the essence of oneself?

-- Lawrence R. Spencer --
2008


Dedication


This book is dedicated to all Immortal Spiritual Beings, whether they are
aware of themselves as such, or not. It is especially dedicated to the
wisdom, courage and integrity of those Greater Beings, who in various
incarnations at various times during the past, in the present and into the
future, enkindle and carry the Flame of Truth into the darkest corners of the
universe.

This dedication is not only to the philosophical teachings and technologies
developed by these beings, but to the demonstrated and documented
courage to apply their philosophy in the face of overwhelming ignorance,
overt hostility and aggressive suppression by lesser beings and by the self serving
vested interests of inter-galactic and planetary political, economic,
and religious institutions.


Though relatively few in number, the profound wisdom and heroic
dedication of such beings, and those who share their quest, have been the
only effective deterrent to spiritual slavery. Freedom, Communication,
Creativity, Trust and Truth for all Immortal Spiritual Beings in this universe
is their legacy. The Good Examples set by them is our sanctuary and
sustenance. Personal, diligent application of their teachings is our weapon
against the dwindling spiral of chaos and oblivion that is the material
universe.


-- Lawrence R. Spencer --




     Page 14 -

"Voltaire is quoted as having said: "History is a Mississippi of lies".

According to the comments made by the alien in the interview transcripts,
supplied by Mrs. MacElroy, the fundamental lesson of history is that many,
many gods have become men, but very few men, if any, have returned to
being a god again.

According to the alien being -- "Airl" -- if anything he / she / it supposedly
communicated can be trusted -- and if the "translation" or interpretation of
this alleged communication is accurate, the history of this universe is a "River
of Lies" down which the might and freedom of all-powerful, god-like, immortal
spiritual beings ended and was lost in a Sea of Matter and Mortality.

Furthermore, according to the very direct and undiplomatic statements made
-- which seem to express the "personal opinion" of the alien -- if one were
traveling the far reaches of the universe in search of a place called "Hell", it
would be an accurate description of Earth and the inhabitants in its current
condition.

To further compound, complicate, and magnify the "incredible" source of the
"interview transcriptions" I received from Mrs. MacElroy, is the fact that they
are:

1) based almost entirely on "telepathic communication" between the alien
and Mrs. MacElroy.

2) many of these interviews discuss "paranormal" activities of "immortal
spiritual beings".

Of course, most "scientific 'authorities' " are unwilling to acknowledge or
perceive spiritual phenomena of any kind.

The dictionary definition of the word paranormal is:

adjective:

1. cannot be explained by scientific methods.
2. supernatural, or seemingly outside "normal" sensory channels.

By definition, people who use the word "paranormal" are 1) not able to
explain spiritual phenomena and 2) spiritual phenomena are outside of their
normal sensory channels.

In short, scientists suffer from the inability and/or unwillingness to
perceive and/or explain spiritual activities. Therefore, the discussion of
spiritual activities or spiritual universes in this book, are expected to be
understood only by those who can and will perceive such things."


I'm Playing Those Mind Games With Myself. Don't Bother Me.

"Rock And Roll (In A Black Hole)"


(Glorious creatures of our future, to be induced by genetic manipulation)

A number one said he wins fight
A number two said "It's a Saturday night"
A number three said "Come look at the whore"
A number four said "Please, give me some more"

You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl

A number five said he Captain Kirk
A number six said "I want to hurt you, jerk"
A number seven said "I'm Peeping Tom"
A number eight said "Let's drop the bomb"

(You may think you're normal, but you are all product of mutation.
You may think you're normal, but you are all product of mutation.)

We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll

A number one said "Let's get this right"
A number two said "You're outta sight"
A number three said "Go wipe down the door"
A number four said "Hey, this is war"

You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl
You gotta, gotta open your mind, girl

A number five said he Captain Kirk
A number six said "I gotta get to work"
A number seven said "Go fuck the prom"
A number eight said "Hey, cherry bomb"

(You may think you're normal, but you are all product of mutation.
You may think you're normal, but you are all product of mutation.)

We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll

(What's gonna happen when mutations are uncontrollable?)

We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
We're all dancing in a black hole
When all we wanna do is rock and roll
--------------


Friday, February 21, 2014

Kindness is Godliness

I'm so in desire it's rushing through me. I mae eve n uh mmm uuuuh do that. Thinking about you. I don't even haf ta think about your body, I just think about you, and I'm aroused. That is strange. I don't understand it. Maybe I'm fooling myself, maybe this really hahahaa isn't desire....maybe it is something worse...oh my goodness, like love, for example. Wat could be wors than love? Nothing. Everything else is easy peasy. Simple. But love, eeewww, it's weird.... I don't like it, I'm not in control anymore. I have a great mind. I take control. I don't allow falling in love or uhm, surprisingly finding yourself in love, very lightly. So I take control of the situation and I make myself be able to handle it, no  matter what. It doesn't last long at intervals, but holy fog it lasts a hell of a long time so we have to continuously catch ourselves or guard ourselves everywhere everytime ever for ever because love just doesn't disappear! It's strange ain't it? Aren't you scared of it too? Ah? Well, I am and I am not. So there. Ha! Ultimate in non-polarization. I shall free you. Just send all your children my way and I will depolarize them. No more prisons. We are all free.

So, my all en er gy friend....what are we doing to each other? Shall we be more kind? I can handle that better.

But I'm going to go lay down on my bed and dream of you, and I think, I'll dream of you again when I fall asleep. I'm so wicked in my dreams too. You should see me. Would you like to join me ?  Come.

Cut Right Through You....and swim inside.

The term superdimensionalmetaphysical blog looks like a sword. The soft color on the left side looks as though the lettering is smaller, whilst the lettering on the right side looks a touch larger so that it does, it looks like a sword under the lady's chin. Perhaps she's a ninja and holds that sword right under her mouth, at her throat chakra, just ready, ready to swing it any way it needs to be swung, at the ssssssssssssssssssite of action. Once spoken, no taking it back.

Ultra Black.

Luffly.

I think in love I am. A terrible thing. Most frightening. But I do know how to survive. If I can't take it I can always break it. I definitely know how hahahah to do that thing. Nevertheless, sometimes, sometimes I feeeeeeel, sometimes I think I can just fold over, and allow all that heady stuff to come in.

David Bowie - Station to Station (full album HQ)


Yea, the term spermicidal does turn me off. Is there a better way of enjoying ourselves?
Boy am I ever 'green', I need some purple in me.


 
 

 
 
To me you're gorgeous. (Koyi K Utho)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Other Sounds.


    All Kinds Of Other Sounds. Or so they say. Let's look at this statement. Or what turned out to be one.

When you're playing an instrument, guitar...then uh, the strings, are the things, that make the sound. So when you vibrate the string on a thing called a guitar, you get one sound. But! When you do that, you are also seeing that one string stimulates the other strings around it, or what was that word? oh yes, influence. Then you take your fingers which are influenced by your idea, or spirit, or what ever you want it to be, and you strum the other strings until the sound is dizzying inside your mh mh, whatever.


Let's hear somemusic.

Please.


Sailing - Christopher Cross


And this is what I think of you....ohhh ok. Feel.

Goldfrapp - Ooh La La


And then, because I just can't get enough

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8GsyVvN9qo

Hahahaaa...... Yes, you are like the angel. but. I am like the, let's level...I can't give my identity away.

Nine Inch Nails, One





Killers turn me on. But I don't know why. Maybe it's because of their lovely head. I so do, admire intelligence. (You might not think you're a killer, but to me, you are.)

Goldfrapp - Lovely Head


We'd like to find a killer album to kill this lovely post with. How about, Queen? Let's. Let us see the Queen.


Queen - Greatest Hits volume I


This is it. Dance away the heart ache dance away. We need to hear some Roxy Music.

Dance Away - Roxy Music (live tv show 1979)




You know, this is my way of saying thank you, for being there, when after my sister died and I found my sister 'n law stole her jewelry box while we were all mourning, and not interested in that kind of thing, you know? So finding out ten months later that she did take and steal from me, I felt like I wanted to kill all that emotion in me, and you helped. You were so kind to be there, to listen, and help me deal with the whole thing. Love you Al!



All Man. That's What. ALL Maaaaan...


Alright, too much serious stuff below me. Let's get higher, haha, past all that and up to something fine, RE fined, so refined, it's air. We can breath now. Oh my goodness, I've been thinking of you all day. You, refinement. So handsome too. Anyway, enough of that, I'm trying to get you out of my mind. Oh well, damn, now you have evidence that I have been thinking about you, and that it is so pleasant, hahaha, that I can't stop thinking about you. I like it. Hhaaha. So why should I stop? No one ever went after someone or something they hahah didn't want, hahahahahahahaaa....hilarious.

Nevermind. Let's get serious. There's some really naaaassss music. I want to hear some.


Uhm, uh. Can you think of anything to play?

I'm thinking, I'm thinking.

Ok, stop thinking, start getting. Action. So, what I was just singing errlier was
"sometimes I feeeeel, sometiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimes IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel......like I've been tied to a whipping post, tied to a whipping post, oh Lord I think I am daaaa  aaaaa Yin!/ Yummy, he's so cute. So anyway. That then is the song we'll play. That one.


The AL L ma aaa n Brothers, uh, gud stuff.




The Allman Brothers - Whipping Post



Hey how's a for some MORE fun!?
FRANK ZAPPA - Whippin' Post




In other words, focking Allah man, are you not, some, thing. That wasn't a question. That was actually a statement. Hahaha. So. You're Black? Great. That WUZ a qvestion. Meet Ultra Black. Me female, you male. Hahahaaa.....







Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Physics of Abductions


Translation Curated By Dorica Manu

Key Words
Abductions’  Testimonies, Time Freezing, Real Reality, Virtual Reality, Consciousness,  Planck
Constants, Physical Universe Vs. Conscious Universe,Hologram, Holographic Brain,
Holographic Reality

Key Scientists
Max Planck, Alan Aspect, David Bohm, Karl Pribram

Abstract
At the end of this article we will be able to understand with the help of the modern Physics that
we are not living in this great, big, huge physical Universe as they want us to believe, but we are
experiencing instead a Holographic Reality lit up buy the Consciousness where the Holographic
Universe is as big as 10-33 centimeters and it last 10-44 seconds.

Dr. Corrado Malanga is a researcher professor and teacher in Organic Chemistry in the University
of Pisa. He’s been studying UFO and aliens for the last 40 years. He is currently interested in the
matters concerning the Alien Abductions, which he studies through the use of Regressive
Hypnosis and Neuro Linguistic Programming techniques.


Introduction To “The Physics Of Abductions”

After all that we’ve said we are finally able to develop an omni comprehensive theory for present
physics, in the light of what the abductions’ witnesses refer on what they see during an alien
abduction. Our abductees are in fact, nothing more and nothing less than observers, who report
to us the physical sensations of everything that happens during an abduction.
So we’ll use those
sensations and those visual, auditory and kinesthetic observations to verify if the Bohm’s
holographic  theory of the universe, which we described earlier, enables us to:

1 – understand how abductions take place, but also

2 – correctly describe the universe, both in its holographic and in its real component.

Therefore, we should absolutely trust the abductees’ testimonies instead of considering them as
local misinterpretations of very different events, as present science and state ufologists do.

The misrepresentation is supposedly due to voluntary or involuntary falsification of the facts
determined by the pathological need to be in the center of attention or by the absence of the
needed prerequisites necessary for our witnesses in order to correctly understand what really
happened, instead of a simple UFO event.

We realized long ago that the real maniacs needing to be the centre of attention are the Ufologists
themselves, and we have known for a long while that the alien abduction phenomena are
absolutely real.

The Evidence Coming Out of the Hypnotic Session

We were interested in understanding what happens during an abduction, or, more specifically,
during the beginning and the end of it. We wanted to see if among the details coming out of the
abductees testimonies, there was any detail which could, somehow, lead us on the right track to
understand how virtual reality works (virtual reality is the set of parameters called Space, Time
and Energy). In simple words, we wanted to verify whether the formulas provided by our
researchers were key descriptors  for how Reality works.

But let’s listen to some testimonies from the regressive hypnosis’ recordings, which we produced
over the last twenty years of research.

Testimony #1

The subject was in a club with a friend. They went to the bathroom. His friend was waiting for
him in the hall leading to the bathroom. But the guy inside the restroom came out after at least 25
minutes in a state of mental confusion. Besides, his clothes were dirty with some kind of white
powder, which had a weird smell. His friend asked him for an explanation about him being so
late, but almost immediately the two friends went back in the dancing-room, where there was a lot
of people busy dancing to the rhythm of music. 
When the two decided to leave the club, the one
who had been lock-up in the restroom for 25 minutes went to the cloakroom to take back his coat
and found out that, oddly enough, the coat, too, is dirty with the same white powder.

An NLP session (neuro-linguistic programming: the technique developed by Bandler and Grinder
for the resolution of traumas related to the unconscious suppression of memories), allowed
afterwards to bring to the surface the complete recollection of the event.

When the subject was in the restroom and he was about to exit, he turned around and didn’t find
the door, but some kind of a dark door from which appears the figure of two small gray beings,
dark skinned, no clothing, at about 3 feet above the ground: the usual Grays described in many
abduction experiences.

The subject is completely paralyzed; placed in a horizontal position is being driven through the
large dancing-room where living things appears pellucid and static. The subject passes through
walls, tables and through people that appear inconsistent, as if they were not really there. The two
small Grays drag this body as if it was a litter without wheels towards the exit; they stop at the
cloakroom where one of the two little creatures jumps over to opposite side of the counter and
grabs the subject’s coat, which was lying in the air as if he was on a stretcher. The Little Gray
throws the coat over the body of the abductee and goes out through the door of the club.
Outside, high, there is the usual light which is about to pick the trio and bring them up. Inside the
flying machine the subject is set in a vertical position again, but before that, the two aliens take off
his shoes. The guy had put a large amount of talc inside the shoes in order to put them on more
easily. The talc spills on his clothes and on his coat…

Upon their return the subject and the two small Grays are coming down through the same
“drawing beam”. Our abductee is still paralyzed in horizontal position. They go by the cloakroom
where the abductee recalls that the coat still covering him falls down. The subject goes through
the dancing-room where people are again transparent and nearly invisible, still but in different
positions compared to when he left the room. The abductee is carried back into the bathroom
and at that point… everything comes back to life, the sound of music returns, our abductee
opens the door and finds out that, inexplicably, his clothes have talc on them; he looks at his
friend and is not able to give any plausible explanation: 25 minutes of our time have passed. He’s 
totally confused.

Testimony #2

Under hypnosis the subject is telling what is about to happen. He’s on a train directed to Padua;
he is going visit a friend of his. The train left from Rome and has not yet arrived in Florence.
Suddenly the computer he’s working on, while he is in an empty wagon, gets stuck. Everything
freezes. Everything is still. The train does not move even though it didn’t slow down! It’s simply
motionless.

One side of the car’s cockpit becomes transparent and the subject sees two gray beings arriving,
almost flying, they enter the compartment where, however, nothing is moving. The subject is
taken away and they levitate him out of the train. As usual, a flying saucer is visible up in the sky,
and it will swallow him, but he has time to see beneath him the freeze-frame train where he was,
just in front of a tunnel where it was about to enter.

After an unspecified amount of time when the subject is carried back to his train from above, the
train is still motionless, but in a different position. Everything is still, but the scene takes place in
slow motion. The subject is put back again in the train, in the compartment where he was earlier,
and while the two Grays are leaving, through the same way from whence they came, and through
the train metal sheet, the subject realizes that the computer fell on the floor and that in front of
him, on the left, there’s a sleeping passenger, who was not there earlier.

Suddenly the train is moving again and one can perceive the train sounds and the  vibrations can
be felt again. The controller walks by, our abductee stands up, and he confusedly runs after the
controller along the train corridor and asks him, “How much time before Florence?” The
controller gives him a puzzled look and tells him that they already passed Bologna and that they
are about to reach Padua. (TN: Bologna is app. 60 miles passed Florence)

The confused state of mind of the subject will be noticed by his friend, too, upon his arrival. His
friend gave us his testimony, too.

The laptop instead broke down once and for all.

Testimony #3

A lady recalls thanks to the anchoring technique (an extension of NLP) a traumatic experience that
from her teenage years, when she was about to drown while at the beach with her parents.

Through the use of the anchors, the woman relives a completely different scene from what she
remembered. Actually, she remembered that although she was about to drown, her suit was dry
and her father ran towards her in order to save her. He got mad with the lifeguard and other
people who were there because they weren’t doing anything to save the poor girl. Then they all
went back home without receiving any further explanation. Her mother, too, had a vague
recollection of the event and also very confused and different from what her daughter recalled.

The anchors were revealing something totally different. The girl is in the water when everything
freezes. But she does not breathe water, which therefore does not enter in her lungs, but she sees
the sea bubbling as if something very bright was coming from underneath.

She has the impression of being inside a transparent bubble because she has no direct contact
with the sea-water… she relives the situation looking at the scene from above, and although in a
confused way, she notices that there is something that pulls her in from above. When she gets
back down, everything is freeze-frame. The people passing by are frozen, her father is running
towards her but he’s freeze-frame in his run. You cannot hear any noise.

The father, all of a sudden, takes her by the hand and everything starts moving again. The
abduction lasted a long time but for all the people there on the beach time seemed to be frozen.

Testimony #4

A subject is going back home in his car. It’s evening and there’s a brand new GPS working in the
car. The subject all of a sudden complains for a sudden sleepiness, and he stops his car. Nobody
goes by, or at least one cannot see anybody going by. The subject falls asleep, but when he
wakes up he realizes something pretty strange had happened. His car went through a weird
journey as it is shown in the GPS. The car went through a certain trip, then turned left in a
countryside path; then back and through a loop going back on the common road, continuing on
that for a few more miles. Finally the trail suddenly stops. The issue is that the car is not at the
end of the GPS’s trail, but back at the starting point, as if it was gone back in its journey to the
moment when the subjects fell asleep. But the way back wasn’t recorded. During a hypnosis
session the subject will remember how he didn’t actually fall asleep, but he remembers that, all of
a sudden, and after turning in the  countryside path, a flying machine full of saurian aliens and
Italian military men had abducted him violently.

Testimony #5

One of our abductees had just finished helping his young wife during her delivery. The childbirth
was followed by physicians and all of the pregnancy was followed by us, from a distance, while
explaining the husband, who was an abducted already freed from this issue, what was happening
minute by minute. He was aware of the issue and free from any alien interference, while she was
religious and still unaware of the truth of the matter. Needless to say that all of the pregnancy was
a miraculous venture. First a brain malformation, which was approximately next to the pineal
gland, leads to fears the worst  (but then the malformation disappears).

Afterwards there’s the usual attempt, after approximately seven months and a half, for an early
delivery, as it often happens with the abductees’ children, ( early delivery which is then solved
pharmacologically, ) then the knot on the umbilical cord, (also miraculously solved.)

Then the delivery, which was already in itself a series of miraculous events. It is sufficient to say
that the baby is born with a knot umbilical cord and that, according to the physicians, the baby
should have been dead 2 weeks earlier.

But, as we well know, the aliens are good gynecologists and they follow the delivery of their
future abductee even after the first moments after the childbirth, as we understood through many
testimonies obtained during hypnotic sessions.

Even in this case things go differently.

The nurse gives the little baby to daddy, who needs to bring him downstairs in the nursery using
the elevator. But when he gets out of the elevator, the new dad complains pains in his left arm,
where there is a wound like a burn that is clearly visible.

The anchors technique, which the abductee was already a master of, will reveal the mystery. In
the elevator time stops. A passage opens and from the top of the elevator there comes one of the
usual Grays, which tries to pick up from the parent’s arm the little newborn. The parent offers
resistance or at least he tries, when the little Gray with its stick, that it uses to give a shock, causes
a big burn on the parent’s arm, who desperately lets go. The elevator is still… everything is still…
time doesn’t go by, then… the usual Gray comes back and puts back the baby in the father’s
hands, while in the elevator still stuck: but not before pulling the baby out of some kind of
transparent plastic packing, which has been described also by other abductees. This seems to be
some kind of container to place the newborns. Right after this the elevator starts again, but when
the doors open he can feel the pain on his arm. Only a moment has gone by.

Testimony #6

One of our abductees told us that once, when she was getting off her car to go get some
groceries and she was about to open the groceries store door, before she turns the handle all the
way… she finds herself appearing between two salesgirls which were talking. They are quite
surprised but… what to say? In the moment when the woman opens the shop’s door, time will
stop and her umpteenth unrequested trip starts, together with the usual gray alien.

Time Doesn’t Stop Cause Time Doesn’t Exist

The first impression we could have is that something seems to indicate that time, for the moments
in which the abduction is going on, stops. Things cannot be this way. If time was to stop then we
also would stop and everything would stop. In other words neither me, nor the aliens around me
could move. The same thing would happen also if space was to stop, because it is bound to time
and, as far as we know, when space changes, that produces ìnot voidî values for time.

As we have previously underlined, not only time seems to stop, at times, but it also seems to go
backwards.

A subject woke up after a troubled dream, in which little beings were taking him and abducting
him, taking him away from his bedroom. The abductee, who was not actually dreaming, when he
wakes up out of breath and scared, finds out, looking at the watch on the bedside table, that he
had woken up before going to sleep. He laid down at 11.30pm, and, after a long “dream”, he
woke up at 10.30pm. Another abductee fell asleep while flying on the plane, and when he woke
up he noticed that there was nobody on the plane. He got worried and became breathless looking
for somebody, while the plane was flying, but he fell suddenly asleep again, or rather… he
doesn’t remember what actually happened. Everything will stay in his mind as if it was just a
dream. But is it actually only a dream?

Quantum Physics And Time Freezing

The quantum vision if the universe enable us, for now, to approximately represent the universe.
Actually we had shown that Space-Time is a grid made of points in which only the nodes where
Space and Time entangle, (and this is true also for Energy, but we ignore it here, to simplify –
Author’s note,) are entirely defined (measurable.) So the Universe would exist only in these
points while in their surroundings there would be nothing existing. Points lit up by the axes of
Consciousness – we might say – that, as we had underlined before, works like a movie projector
that gives life to the big screen.

From a distance, the imagine full of information projected on the big screen would seem
homogeneous to a less attentive observer, BUT if better observed through a magnifier, we would
realize that the image is fix only on the points in which the fiber exist, the texture by which the big
screen is made. The image would be unnoticed and unnoticeable between the holes in the fabric’s
weft, without interfering with it.

-White Dot Matrix-


In this figure, every white dot is a virtual reality node, while in the black parts no reality would  exist… We would travel through an accurate but quantized route, jumping from one white node to another, as if our life was a very packed set of photograms, but not a continuous action.

This vision of virtual reality allows us to have very precise measures of time and space and to consider, from one value to the other, not a variation of the same value but two values absolutely distinct from each other, where a second value would not represent anymore an alteration in space time of the first, but a specific measure, completely independent on the other.

In other words, our life would not be a continuum of situations but a long and crowded series of
static imagines, which would follow one another on a hypothetical movie screen.

Then What Happens When The Aliens Arrive?

Let us assume that our existence may be described as a series of situations which, in turn, may be
pictured by an equal number of frames of a movie projected on the drop curtain of the virtual
reality. The film with its events and frames are moving bottom up in space and in time and our
brain reads one frame at a time.

If there was an hypothetical helicopter flying along the film at the same speed the film is moving in time, the pilot would always see, next to him, always the same imagine, always the same picture
and would interact, during his flight, always with the same frame, which he would always and only
highlight with his headlamp, as it is shown in the following pictures.


We’ll see that this is only one aspect of what actually happens, but for now this is a step forward to understand what happens during an abduction. The helicopter is nothing more and nothing less then the alien craft which interferes with your space-time reality, while freezing time locally. This would occur because the alien craft somehow places itself on the time axis of our local reality and interacts, in phase, with our time. Time freezes for us and for the alien, but not for the rest of the animated things, not for the rest of those things endowed with Consciousness, which would tend to disappear from the scenery perceived by the abductee. It is like something is holding us back in Frame number 4 (as in the picture,) while all other “living” things keep on regularly moving forward to Frames number 5, 6, 7…



When an abduction starts we are being pulled out from our virtually pinned frame.In other words, the alien stop our journey on the various frames, let the other characters in the movie continue, as it normally happens, but it blocks us. In order to do this, it travels in time at the same speed as we do, as if it was a car that draws up beside us on a freeway because it goes at the same speed. But this shift is happening only along one axis, Time axis.

When the two cars (the one we drive and the alien drives,) are going at the same speed, they
appear still to each other, and the alien is able to interact with our reality which would appear still
compared with us. It appears still to us because as soon as the alien’s car comes by our side,
both cars block. The landscape doesn’t move anymore and everything is freeze-frame.

Soon we’ll see that even the smallest inconsistency, difficult to understand at this level, will be
quickly resolved, modifying some local parameters. The story-line that we’ve just proposed you
now is just the same one that we advanced before, while suggesting that the alien are physically
moving on the holographic grid, traveling only in time or only in space.

To the abductee this story line would fit exactly to what he/she reports: everything is STILL
except him/her and the aliens, who can move within this freeze-framed space-time. Nobody else’s
around because the other “living” entities moved on to the next frames. Once again we can see
that lifeless things remain still, while living things can move on in the holographic grid, as
sustained by some scholars of Bohm’s virtual reality. And once again virtual reality appears to be
quantized, both in space and time, and along the axis of the potential energies.

Introducing The Concept Of Consciousness Clarifies Everything

Despite all that we have said until now, it is still not clear what do we mean by “living thing”, and
what endows it with degrees of freedom on the holographic grid: freedom that the “non living
things” don’t seem to have.

This aspect is related to introducing the definition of Consciousness. Only the ones endowed
with Consciousness – the ones who possess inside the Real Reality and not only the Virtual
Reality – are considered to be Living Things. All the rest is lifeless. Hence this is our new
definition of life. Life is Consciousness. A fish is Consciousness; an alien is Consciousness; a
human is consciousness; but a refrigerator is not Consciousness; not even a computer is
Consciousness.

The things we have said until now describe virtuality as the projection of real reality,
Consciousness, on a drop-curtain, which is defined by the axis of Space and Time and also by
the axis of Energies, very visible to us as changing colors on the imagines we perceive.

How Big Is The Holographic Universe?

Until now we have “spread” on a single flat the entire virtual universe. Spreading the Universe on
a single flat means building a web full of dots, so called quantum nodes, which are the spots
where virtuality exists: such places represent our hypothetical photo-frames of life. But nor space
neither time or energy exist, since they are virtuality’s creations, at least according to David
Bohm.

Bohm maintains that the Universe it’s all just in one point (“non local universe” as referred to by
physicists). At this “point” we should ask ourselves what’s the graphic distance from one point
on the (holographic, TN) grid to the other.  We know there’s nothing in between. Could this mean
that, as an example, we are not able to quantize the space-time hole which exist between two
events?  If so, we should ask ourselves what happens in the gap between two frames. Does the
Universe stop and, with it, do we stop too? Does it relives in the next frame but we do not realize
anything about it?

For example, a dispute that we might have with a friend would then last billions of years between
one frame and the other, and we wouldn’t be able to realize this at all? We would pause at the end
of every frame and we would wake up at the beginning of the next one, without being conscious
of what happens in between. And this would be right, since there’s nothing in between, and
Consciousness does not interact with the virtual part of itself.

In fact, the question we are asking ourselves is a nonsense from a theoretical point of view.
Actually, between two events there’s no other event, and drawing the events as balls situated at a
certain “X” distance on a grid of points it’s only a graphic representation. OK, but if we want use
a correct graphic representation, we should ask ourselves how big is each ball, and what’s the
correct distance I should use on the space-time plane?

We could answer to the second question based on some data coming from modern physics, and
making use some values calculated by Max Planck, who enjoyed calculating the dimensions of
the smallest measurable things in the Universe.

What’s The Distance Between Two Nodes On The Holographic Space-Time Plane?

There’s a trivial answer for the famous inconsistent question. Whatever is the distance between
the two quantized events would graphically right, because there’s no possibility to define anything
between two events. Under a mathematical point of view this can mean only one thing: that all the
events are in the same point. It’s not possible to space out the events on a space-time plane,
except if we place them all in the same point. In other words, spreading these balls on a flat
surface it’s just a trick used by our mind in order to make them appear distinct and visible at the
same time as different events, instead of an unique event.

David Bohm                   Alain Aspect                Karl Pribram

As a matter of fact, if we overlap two things in a three-dimensional space, our minds think that
there’s only one thing instead of the two overlapping things. From this point of view, representing
all different events side by side along the space and time axes gives us a better understanding of
the differentiation of the events but, from the other point of view, overlapping them, gives us
exactly Bohm’s vision about the non local Universe, where everything exist simultaneously. While
Bohm studies the Holographic Universe’s physics, Alan Aspect brings about evidence that Bohm
might be right, by discovering that two completely separate photons, placed at an arbitrary large
distance from each other, know exactly what is happening to the other one. This has only one
explanation: the Universe is non local and, in fact, the two photons, co-exist in the same point.

Pribram, neurophysiologist, in the same period of time, sustains that the brain is, in fact, a
hologram reader and that it perceives the Universe three-dimensionally while the physics’ laws
govern the hologram’s physics: and that’s it!

The Size Of The Universe

How big is the Universe? The scientists calculated its size based on the data obtained by Plank. 
If we were to think as we have always done, we’d come across huge numbers. For example, our
galaxy, the Milky Way, has a diameter of something like 50,000 light years, which means that it
would take fifty thousands years for a beam of light in order to travel it all. Plank, form his point
of view, calculates rigorously both how small is the smallest measurable thing, and how big is the
whole universe.

Very precise calculi which agree with all the physics known until now, give us precise information:
according to Planck the smallest measurable unit of time is given by the following formula:  tp =
(hG/2πc5)1/2

Where h is Planck’s constant, G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light.

Planck’s length, the smallest physically measurable length, is given by the formula:

lp = (Gh/2πc3)1/2

These are the smallest units on the space-time scale, while the smallest measurable unit of energy
is: E = hν = hc/λ, where λ is the smallest measurable wavelength.

We also have the computation of the smallest measurable quantity of mass and here’s its formula:
mp = (hc/2πG)1/2

Actually, this is not the smallest measurable quantity of mass, but it is instead the smallest quantity
of mass the smallest black-hole could possess if having the Schwarzschild radius, the Compton
wavelength and an effective length equal to Planck’s constant. So, not the smallest thing that exist
but the smallest thing full of matter that exist.

Now, if we take into account that the Universe has an estimated age of 4,3×1017 seconds, we
could also say that the Universe is 8x1060tp ( Planck’s Time ). Based on these parameters, the
calculation we are about to do is accepted by modern science: we can say that Planck’s Time is
equal to approximately 5,391×10-44 seconds while Planck’s Length is 10-33 centimeters.

The Universe In A Grain Of Sand

So, what’s the meaning of Planck’s Time or Planck’s Length, for example, from a pure physical
point of view? They say that beyond these values objects lose definition and cannot be
measured anymore. Often times we have given to this interpretation of the data a limiting meaning.
So, in other words, we thought that, beyond that physical limitation, our devices couldn’t go
beyond those values, bound to the same laws of physics that was calculating the same formulas:
something like a cat that bites its own tail.


-String of Pearls-

Somebody said that God built the Universe and forced some kind of limitation on human observations, just because, without this limitation, God itself could be observed.

It might sound weird but both ideas has some truth in them. What does it mean the fact that after a certain small quantity nothing more can be measured? Does it mean that there’s nothing more to see or that there might exist other small objects which are invisible? If, once again and for all, we were to use the space-time plane placing on that surface the quantized events, we would realize that, if the events were placed next to each other, they would have a certain size. Since nothing exists between two events we could be tempted to collocate them side by side, as many balls
touching each other. These balls would have Planck’s sizes and so we would find out that the
universe has exactly 8×1060 tiny balls along the time axes and, since every ball is defined by all of
the three axis (space, time and energy,) necessarily, it has the same number of tiny balls along the
other two axis: energy and space.

Actually, if the Universe is made up of small events which are defined by Planck’s constants, we
could definitely say that the Universe is characterized by many events, the smallest possible,
placed side by side. In this way, both the spaces-time continuum and quantization itself are
guaranteed.

Even if physics does tell us how many are the smallest visible tiny balls (the smallest events,) that
we can place on the holographic grid, it does not tells us how they are placed in relation to each
other. But Bohm does say this: all the tiny balls are in the same point. And this is actually the only
paradigm that offers a unique solution instead of an infinity of solutions, as infinite are the ways to
display the ball on a space-time plane.

The Consciousness Of The Universe

So, if we agree that the smallest possible object is a Planck object, we must agree that the
Universe is not bigger then 10-33 centimeters (3,9×10-34 inches,) on the space axes, and about
10-44 seconds on the time axes. Even the axes of the potential energy would be automatically well
defined by the value of the Planck constant multiplied by the frequency of the smallest existing
particle. The whole Universe would be a tiny ball. How can I fit in in a small ball the whole
Universe calculated by a “certain” part of Physics as “huge”? It’s enough to remember that
space, time and energy are just virtual (meaning “modifiable” ) and not real, and that they are
generated by Consciousness. One cannot measure Consciousness! In fact, in the definition of
Consciousness itself lies the axiom that it cannot be either measured or seen because it is
immutable, (because it is real reality, which means “non alterable”, “variable free”).

It is widely sustained that an Universal Consciousness exist, or better said, that the Universe has a
Consciousness component. (Searle’s Ontology of the Mind in the Universe: A Criticism (Daniel
D. Novotny, UB Spring 2002, second version)

The scientist Stephen Hawking even asks some philosophic problems, which we are unable to
solve using the scientific method, since this subject requires a logical-philosophical method.
Hawking asks questions which are mostly of philosophical and theological nature, as for example:

- Why is the Universe the way it is?

- Why there is “something” instead of “nothing?

- Why does the Universe need a Creator in order to explain its existence?

So, Hawking rises questions on the creation and on the Creator God. But here is one questions
that rises from all of Hawking’s considerations:

- Can such an “everything theory” explain its existence?

Hawking deals with two points. He doesn’t realize that he somehow calls God using the name
Consciousness, and he faces the scientific way of thinking while asking if it is possible to
understand everything through reasoning and formulas, raising the same issue that we have raised
in this work.

Alexandre V. Boukalov, from the Centre of Physical and Space Researches, International Institute
of Socionics, on his article called ìConsciousness and Physical Universeî published by the 
Physics of Consciousness and Life, Cosmology and Astrophysics Journal, issue 1, 2001, asks if
there is a conscious universe. He maintains that in our Universe, which has a radius of 1026
meters, taking into consideration that every existing cell has the Planck’s length, there are  10183
operational cells in what he calls the Metagalaxy (the Universe, Author’s note.) The operational
frequency for this cells works at ωpl = 1/tpl~1044. The operations that our Universe computes at
the Planck’s level would be:  Z=N・ω=10183∑1044~10227 each second.

We need to remark that the number of operating cells is practically the same that we assumed for
just one dimension, since (8 x 1060 tp)3 ≅ N. These values should be the ones to assign to a
universal Consciousness, or rather, they would be the operations that the virtual part of
Consciousness would do if it could be compared to a computer.

Boukalov’s number of cells represent the number of the smallest pieces of virtuality. Such pieces
represent the Universe’s bricks, and they all are placed in just one virtual point, having the
dimensions of a tiny ball made of many tiny balls, which interact with each other only through the
geometrical operator’s laws. This vision, which is quite precise, is perfectly consistent with the
abductees’ testimonies.

*This more illustrated article can also be found at:

http://flashmentalsimulation.wordpress.com/the-physics-of-abductions/

Monday, February 10, 2014

Horus-Ra as the Archontic Alien Parasite

This is the PDF:  Horus-Ra as the Archontic Alien Parasite

And here's the article by Eve Lorgen:

Horus-Ra as the Archontic Alien Parasite: A follow-up interview with Maarit a Scandinavian MILAB-abductee


Synopsis

This article focuses on the parasitic nature of Horus-Ra as an “Archontic” interdimensional being discovered within the milab and alien abduction experience. The notation as Horus-Ra was chosen due to the being’s similar appearance to the ancient Egyptian hawk headed being, as well as taking a snake-like form. A follow up interview with Maarit, a Scandinavian milab, is featured as the key witness of a most fascinating, bizarre and disturbing account that involves elements of alien and milab abductions, rituals, genetic manipulation, mind control and outright spiritual warfare.

The article is divided into several categories:

Ancient Gnostic View of Archons as described in tractates of the Nag Hammadi Library

Optogenetics, Alien Genetic Manipulation, Mitochondrial DNA, and the importance of the coherence of the human triad of mind, spirit and soul

Human Clones of Abductees and the Black Box Soul Recycling Technology

Ritual Elements in Milab Experiences

Maarit’s Experience with the Horus-Ra Archon Parasite

Horus-Ra as a Huge Snake and Birdman

Mind Controlled Ops and Torture to Comply with the Nefarious NWO Agenda

Sketches and Maarit’s drawings of the Horus-Ra Snake, Emblems and Draco DNA



















Sunday, February 9, 2014

The Archons By John Lamb Lash


This is from John Lamb Lash's website:

Alien Dreaming: The Enigma of the Archons


Fractal Visions

The Archons may be regarded as progeny of Sophia, but not in the same sense as species born and sustained in Gaia's womb, the terrestrial biosphere. In fact, they are called Archons (from the Greek archai, "primordial, first, antecedent in time") because they arise in the planetary system before Earth was formed into a habitat for life. Sophia's unilateral Dreaming produced a power surge from the cosmic center, and the Goddess, shooting forth like a torrential current, impacted the inert fields of primordial matter in an unusual way. Gnostic texts use the term "aborted fetus" to describe the results of this impact..

"A veil exists between the world above, and the realms that are below; and shadow came into being beneath the veil. Some of the shadow became matter, and was projected apart. And what Sophia created became a product in the matter, like an aborted fetus.
 (The Hypostasis of the Archons, 94: 5 - 15)"

To the Coco de Mer icon we can now add a graphic variation to suggest how the Archons emerge from Sophia's Dreaming, like a leak from a placenta. As explained in the preceding essay of this trilogy, the Coco de Mer with cosmic detailing represents the "trimorphic protennoia," the original three-body world of Sophia's Dreaming. Our world, the terrestrial biosphere coupled with the sun and the moon, is the manifestation of thisDreaming. With the arising of the Archons, another Dreaming comes into play outside our threefold world order. I propose to call this the Alien Dreaming. (This choice of language will become self-evident as we proceed.) This other Dreaming is a spin-off of Sophia's power of emanation, an exotic spill, yet it does not impede or arrest Her original Dreaming.
The Gaia Mythos describes how the impact of the Aeon Sophia upon the density of atomic matter produced a massive fracture, like the shatter pattern on an ice pond. The pattern has a center where Sophia is located (identified by the Mandelbrot Set), and a spider-web extension of fracture lines that run in all directions (the frozen sea of fractal waves). Episode 9 describes how Sophia, situated in the center of the impact zone, sees around Her something like a sea of tensile waves, and riding the waves, or actually composing the waves they appear to ride, are self-repeating forms that resemble seashorses. These seahorses are similar to the forms that appear at high reiteration of the equation for the Mandelbrot Set. These forms correspond to the anatomical type spontaneously generated from formless atomic matter by Sophia's impact, a type called the "shadow body," haibes in Coptic.

(A word on fractals: Although fractal-like patterns appear in nature (in ferns, for instance: the disposition of the leaves on a stem is repeated in the form of the stemmed branches), the self-similar forms produced by high iteration are not natural, strictly speaking. Fractals such as those pictured here result from feeding a mathematical formula into a computer and having the formula reprocess itself, over and over again. However, the forms so produced do resemble the famous "paisley" seen by many people who took LSD in the 1960s. I would argue, first, that fractals are consistently seen in altered states, and second, that the patterns thus seen may also represent real, though supernatural processes in the cosmos at large.)

The fractal formations described in the Gaia Mythos (Episodes 9 - 10) are actual physical phenomena that occur spontaneously when an Aeon (a mass-free, high-porosity current of stellar plasma) pours into the dense fields of elementary matter. At first these "fractal seahorses" seem to be inanimate structures, rigid and almost crystalline in nature, but by the very fact that Sophia beholds them, they become animated. In the second stage of the unfoldment described in Trimorphic Protennoia, the Aeon Sophia "descends to empower her fallen members by giving them spirit or breath." (NHLE 1996, p. 511) Thus the tensile forms morph from semi-rigid seahorses into rounded fetal forms with tails, but the tails, it seems, keep falling off and turning into other embryos. By this bizarre process of self-repeating generation, the neonate horde of the Archons emerges.

The Lord Archon

The Hypostasis of the Archons describes a further development that follows the initial emergence of the foetal Archontic entities. In the passage cited here, I apply some concepts drawn from modern astronomy to develop a more vivid picture of events presumably observed by Gnostic seers in the cosmos at large:

"A veil exists between the world above [in the galactic core], and the realms that are below [exterior, in the galactic limbs]; and shadow came into being beneath the veil. Some of the shadow [dark mass] became [atomic] matter, and was projected apart [partially formed into elementary arrays, the dema]. And what Sophia created [by her impact] became a product in the matter [the dema], [a neonate form] like an aborted fetus. And [once formed] it assumed a plastic shape molded out of shadow, and became an arrogant beast resembling a lion. It was androgynous, because it was from [neutral, inorganic] matter that it derived. (The Hypostasis of the Archons, II, 4, 93:30 ff, with my glosses in brackets.)"

A close reading reveals a crucial detail: after the initial formation of the embryonic Archon types, a second variant of "shadow body" arises, with distinct characteristics of its own. The Hypostasis of the Archons describes it as "an arrogant beast resembling a lion," but this creature is also described (in another cosmological text, the Apocryphon of John 10: 5) as "a serpentine body (drakon) with a lion-like face." Thus there are two distinct types of Archons: a foetal or embryonic type, and a drakonic or reptilian type.

In The Hypostasis of the Archons (93: 30 - 94:5), a supplicant asks the great angel Eleleth, "Teach me about the faculty of the Archons, how did they come into being, and by what kind of genesis, of what material, and who created them and produced their force." The teachings given in response to this question were precise and detailed. Two distinct variants of the Archon type are indicated, and their behaviors are also specified. Another cosmological treatise, The Tripartite Tractate, states that "the two orders [of Archons] assaulted one another, fighting for command because of their manner of being." (84: 5-15) Due to the two distinct stages of their generation, the Archons are invested with an aggressive and divisive nature, fighting among their own ranks. The problem is provisionally resolved, however, when the reptilian type assumes dominance over the massive horde of neonates, and, indeed, over the entire realm of the dema affected by Sophia's plunge:

"Opening his eyes, he [the drakonic Archon] saw a vast quantity of matter without limit [spread through the galactic limbs], and he became arrogant, saying "It is I who am God [the sole deity of these regions], and there is no other apart from me." (Hyp Arch, 94:20)"

While the neonate Archons are inert, their forms arrested at a premature stage of development, the reptilian leader is aggressive, territorial, and charged with demonic powers. For one thing, he is a formidable shapeshifter:

"Ialdabaoth had a multitude of faces more than all of them, so that he could put a face before all of them, according to his desire... He shared his fire with them, therefore he became lord over them. Because of power of the glory he possessed of his mother's light, he called himself God. And he did not obey the place from which he came. (The Apocryphon of John, 11:35 - 12:10)"

The declaration of the chief Archon that he is the only god in the cosmos is, needless to say, a defining moment in Gnostic cosmology — if not in human evolution as well. All the cosmological texts describe this event, with slight variations. Gnostics were insistent on the identification of Yaldabaoth with Yahweh or Jehovah, the tribal god of the Hebrews. This deity is not only blind, but witless and insane (Hypostasis of the Archons 89: 24-25). To Gnostics insanity is not so much unsoundness of mind as the consequence of failure to correct mental errors. The mentality of the Archons "cannot be rectified," and, what's worse, "the archontic nature is not capable of development." (Gilhus, The Nature of the Archons, p. 40) Due to the manner of their generation, Archons have no ennoia, no innate intentionality. Theirs is an Alien Dreaming, set apart from the biosphere, the intelligent life-field of Gaia.

The concept of a god who is both void of will power and insane is apparently unique to Gnosticism. Needless to say, when Gnostics expressed their views on the identity of Jehovah to devout Jews and to Christians who also revered the Jewish Father God, they were not well received.

The Apocryphon of John adds crucial details to the Archon scenario. For one thing, it presents a rare instance where Sophia is actually called the mother of the Archons. It also says of the chief Archon that "he did not obey the place from which he came." This is a telling detail. The fact that the chief Archon moves away from the places where he arose indicates a key concern of Gnostics: the boundary-violating tendencies of the Archons. From the outset they are an invasive species. (And all of this indicates the psychopathic being.)

The drakonic Archon is said to be blind (Coptic bille), so he does not see either the Pleroma or Sophia. "Blindness of the spiritual world characterizes the Archons." (Gilhus, p. 17). He is called Samael and Saklas. Samael is Hebrew and Saklas is Aramaic for "blind one." Understanding the blindness of the Archons is crucially important to our detection of how they can affect humanity.

Alias Jehovah

The chief of the Archons is also called the Lord Archon. He is also given the bizarre name, Yaldabaoth (pronounced Yall-DAH-buy-OT). Scholars disagree on what this name might mean, and how it was derived. By one translation it means "the child who crosses space." By another, it means "chief of the horde." (Jarl Egil Fossum, The Name of God and the Angel of the Lord, p. 332-6.) Thus it seems to slur together allusions to both types of Archons. In the Old Testament the title yhwh seba'ot, Yahweh Sebaoth, occurs 276 times as the title of the father god. (Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, p. 155) Gershom Scholem, pre-eminent scholar of the Cabala and Jewish mysticism, explained Ialdabaoth as "a compound of the Aramaic active participle yaled (i.e., 'to beget') and the name Abaoth, which represents an abridged form of the name Sabaoth. Thus, Ialdabaoth means 'the begetter of Sabaoth'." (Nathaniel Deutsch, The Gnostic Imagination, p. 55) And there are half a dozen more interpretations.

It is likely that the name Ialdabaoth is simply a variant of Jehovah, the paternal father god of the Hebrews. Gnostics identified Jehovah with the Lord Archon and rejected the OT and the entire Judaic plan for salvation as a subterfuge of the Archons. It makes sense that they would have used the same term used by Jews to expose the true nature of the Jewish deity.

When it came to knowledge that they considered crucial to human survival, and to humanity's coevolution with Sophia, Gnostics could be confrontational, and totally unconcerned about whom they might offend. Their uncompromising and sometimes scornful attitude, combined with their failure to anticipate the high degree of physical violence that would be triggered by their challenge to Judeo-Christian beliefs, undoubtedly fuelled the vicious fanatisicm that destroyed the Mysteries.

Magnification of the fractal Archon generation presents a graphic image that seems to fit the scenario described by Gnostic seers. The embryonic type, or neonate Archon, is clearly defined, but so is another entity: the reptilian Archon with its avaracious jaw and long spermatic tail. This "arrogant beast" seems to lunge at the entrails of the embryonic type. Right at the point where the embryonic Archon would have a nurturing umbilicus, the reptilians move in invasively. The neonate Archon remains passive, apparently sucking its finger or thumb!

Something odd is happening in the lower part of the neonate's body, for its seahorse-tail is precariously jointed to the torso. The embryonic type remains self-absorbed, but reacts to the aggression of the other type by dropping its tail, as frightened reptiles do. We wonder if the disjointed tail will form another neonate, or another reptilian. The reptilian form does appear to be fractally repeated in the tail-structure of the embryonic type, as if the tail broke off and became an entity of its own, rather than another embryo.

The element of fear figures largely in the behavior of the Archons and their effect on humanity. In the Old Testament, fear of God is held to be one of the primary marks of religious experience. The possibility that human fear is a kind of nutriment for certain invasive extraterrestrials has been widely argued in the ET/UFO debate. The Second Treatise of the Great Seth says that the agenda of the Archons is "fear and slavery." The Archons wish to keep humankind under "the contraint of fear and worry." (NHLE 1990, p. 367) Other passages also warn against the Archons' use of fear as a psychological weapon.

In another striking detail, the reptilian type seems to be holding a sphere in its jaws, recalling the mythical image of a serpent who offers forbidden fruit: for instance, the Serpent in the Garden of Hyperborea with the golden apple in its mouth. Is the neonate eating from this rounded fruit? Gnostics had their own version of what transpired in the Garden of Eden, events in which the Archons were deeply involved, and so it is perhaps not surprizing to see hints of the Paradise scenario at this primal stage of cosmic activity.

All this activity in the fractal generation of the Archons is imaginal, but it is not imaginary, i.e., not purely made up in our minds. Recreating what Gnostic seers observed is a sober use of imagination, not a flight into make-believe. It takes non-ordinary reason to describe what is happening here, but the scenario so developed is entirely reasonable and coherent on its own terms.

Foetal Conflict

However the Gnostic seers of the Mysteries came to imagine the generation of the Archons, the high-iteration fractals around the Mandelbrot Set fit their scenario in an uncanny manner. And they do more as well, for the fractal embryos and reptilians also mimic features of human gestation (or vice versa). In human conception, the embryonic sac consists of two parts: the yolk sac (4 in the illustration below), and the foetal mass attached to it (1), suspended in amniotic fluid (2). At the moment the developing embryo gains initial anatomical definition, it is fish-like (a fact that medical science likes to use to remind us of our pre-human origins). It has a distinct head, and a tail, and a third feature, the umbilicus that connects it to the yolk sac through which it is fed. The fractal generation of the Archons exhibits all these features in a clear and precise manner.

As the embryo grows, the yolk sac (4) contracts, and there is at the same time a secondary development. Also connected to the umbilicus is the allontois (5), a vesicle that fills the interspace between the amnion (3) and the chorion (7), the outermost boundary of the entire placental sac. A kind of morphological tension plays between these evolving structures: for the allontois to grow, it must contract or press back (repress) the yolk sac that feeds the growing fetus. Unless the allontois grows in this manner, the protective placenta cannot be fully matured. A similar tension pertains between the embryonic Archons and the reptilians. Just as embryonic development in humans is divided between the growth of the fetus fed from the yolk sac, and the repression of the yolk sac to produce the full-grown placenta from the allontois membrane, the power of the Archons is divided by the nature of their generation ("because of their manner of being," cited above) This conflict is partially resolved when the reptilian type assumes dominance over the massive horde of neonates.

Gnostics certainly knew what an aborted foetus looks like. Morally opposed to biological procreation by humans, they were known to practice birth control, and must have assisted others to do so. They would have known from direct observation that the foetus aborted at an advanced stage of gestation does not resemble a half-baked omelette; it has the vestiges of anatomical form. Their choice of this bizarre metaphor must have been intentional, reflecting the occult perception that Archon anatomy mimics the neonate form of humans. Such a metaphor is extremely valuable, not only because it allows us to visualize what Gnostic seers detected by extrasensory perception, but also because it establishes a close tie between the human species on earth and the pre-terrestrial Archons.

For more on this, see the closing passage, "Cosmic Cousins."

The Serpent Power

The description of a "lion-headed serpent" for the Ialdabaoth is arresting. For Gnostics the lion represented the blind force of procreation (an association that probably stems from Egyptian Mystery schools, not to mention observation of the force and noise of lions mating in the desert), so the sperm-like body of the lion-headed reptilians is even more appropriate. This drakonic type of Archon appears on Gnostic germs, not because the Gnostics worshipped the reptilians— far from it— but because they viewed the image as a magical antidote to Archontic influence. Rather in the way a skull on a label indicates a poisonous liquid, thus preventing us from mistaking it for a liquid that is safe to drink, the lion-serpent image was represented on Gnostic amulets to ward off Archontic intrusion.

The lion-headed serpent of the Gnostics is called by magical names such as Ophis, Knuphis, and Abrasax. In the occult anatomy of Asian mysticism and Yoga, this reptile is known as Kundalini, the serpent power. Gnostics who practiced Kundalini yoga were called Ophites, from the Greek ophis, "snake." This cult was condemned by early Christians as pagan "snake-worshippers." To the mundane and uninitiated mind, the Kundalini serpent can only be conceived by crude literalization. To Gnostics, the lion-headed serpent crowned with solar rays was not only the image of the Lord Archon, but also of the source of spiritual power that allows human beings to resist that entity.

Experts who do not look outside Gnosticism to understand it never mention Kundalini, but unorthodox and esoteric scholars such as G. R. S. Mead, Helena Blavatsky, and C. W. King (Gnostics and Their Remains) make the connection routinely, as do comparative mythologists such as Joseph Campbell and Alain Danielou. In The Inner Reaches of Outer Space, Campbell shows how the image of Kundalini, the "serpent power," appears in world art from the Indus Valley circa 2300 BCE and continues right across the spectrum of ancient cultures, well down into the Common Era. As late at the 16th century, golden thalers in Germany (Campbell, Fig. 8) showed the Crucifixion on one face and a serpent draped over the cross on the other. At that late date, Christ would have been identified with Kundalini — without an inkling of why, however — but to Gnostics the snake on the cross was a cancellation of the saving power attributed to crucifixion (i.e., the glorification of suffering as a redemptive force). Arousal of Kundalini produces ecstacy, triggers superconsciousness, opens the occult faculties, and releases waves of healing energy that flush physiological and hormonal secretions through the body.

As the mythical serpent guarding the Tree of Knowledge in Genesis, Kundalini was "the messenger of salvation" for Gnostics. In a complete reversal of the usual reading of the Fall, Gnostics regarded the serpent as a spiritual ally to primal humanity, "the first to attempt to release mankind from bondage to an unknowing god who had identified himself with the Absolute and thus blocked the way to the tree of eternal life. (Campbell , p. 78) The "unknowing god" who falsely identified himself with the Absolute is of course Yaldabaoth, alias Jehovah.

Gnostics taught that nous, the spiritual intelligence endowed in humanity, could be blocked by the Archons. This occurs through Archontic intrusion affected by a kind of subliminal invasion at the level of thought and language (i.e., mental syntax). But nous could be reinforced through accessing the power of Kundalini, an ecstatic current that normally rests dormant in the human body. In his monograph on the Archons, I. S. Gilhus notes that "the erotic strategy is the most important means used by the pneumatics to save the lost light." (p. 51) Pneumatics is the Gnostic terms for humans who pursue the path of psychosomatic illumination, the key method of Gnostic religion. Pneuma, "spiritual force," is developed by cultvation of nous, "higher intelligence." But the Archons present a blind field of resistance to this process: in short, they rely on humans remaining ignorant of their inherent spiritual potential.

When Kundalini is raised from its dormant state, higher intelligence blossoms, and there are other effects as well. Gnostic sects such as the Ophites practiced the communal raising of Kundalini to produce an protective envelope against Archontic intrusion. In effect, they held Kundalini, the sexual-spiritual energy locked in the body structure, to be the main instrument of defense against the Archons. The Dialogue of the Savior, NHC III, 5 (85), contains this exchange:

"Judas said, "Behold, The authorities (Archons) dwell above us, so it is they who will rule over us."
 The savior said, "It is you who will rule over them. But only when you rid yourselves of jealousy, and take on the protection of the Light, and enter the nymphion (bridal chamber)."

The savior-teacher is emphatic that we have power over the Archons, but he also makes it clear that some human failings impede the use of our power. The Greek word phthonos may be translated as "jealousy" or "envy." Gnostics considered envy to be the signature of the Archons, as well as the key human failing that makes us vulnerable to their intrusion. "The protection of the Light" comes through activated Kundalini, often described as a lightning-like tide of electrified light that pours through the body. "Nymphion" is a code word for the ambient cell of psychophysical protection generated by high levels of Kundalini.

Sir John Woodruffe, the great transmitter of Hindu Tantric wisdom to the West, directly identified the practice of Kundalini yoga (raising the serpent power through the channels of the spine) with Gnostic rites of "serpent worship." (Shakti and Shakta, p. 191 ff.) Buddhist scholars such as E. A. Evans-Wentz, J. M. Reynolds, and H. V. Guenther have made similar observations, but Gnostic scholars have not reciprocated because they do not look outside their genre to understand the theory and practice of Gnosis.

The lion-serpent image is displayed over and over in heiroglyphic form on the walls of the Temple of Horus at Edfu, forty miles south of Nag Hammadi. In the cult of Hathor celebrated there, the lion-serpent represented the "royal seed" of the pharoahs. The royal child Horus is often depicted in a finger-sucking gesture that vividly recalls the posture of the embryonic Archons. Did Egyptian priests who directed the breeding of the dynastic families have intimate knowledge of Kundalini, as well as the Archons? The Kundalini serpent is displayed in Egyptian sacred art by a standing cobra, or a pair of corbras, sometimes wound on a staff, and by the uraeus, the cobra headress of divine empowerment. The ceremonial braid on the side of Horus' head was yet another indication of the serpent power.The pharaonic braid, traditionally worn on the right side of the head, visually repeats the form of the spermatic cobras of Edfu. The sacred iconography carries explicit, but highly occult knowledge: Horus is the child whose right-brain cerebral functions are heightened by the serpent power.

The "esoteric" imagery of the serpent power operates at several levels at once. We shall see that the complex biological symbolism of Gnostic myth has much to teach us about the nature of the Archons, as well as how we can resist them.

The Rape of Eve

Ialdabaoth is also called the Archigenetor, "the master breeder." (Apoc John II, 12, 25) Gnostics, to whom ethics must be consistent with cosmology, regarded biological procreation, insofar as it is an involuntary act, as a mindless mechanism that makes humans accessory to the head Archon. How Ialdabaoth breeds his own type, and controls the breeding of the embryo-types, and may even be involved in interbreeding with humans — are some of the more baffling elements in the Sophia mythos. Several texts in the NHC describe the Archons' attempt to "rape Eve": i.e., inseminate the human species. The texts make it clear, however, that they do not succeed in their aims. The Hypostasis of the Archons describes this episode:

"Then the Archons approached Adam. and when they saw his female counterpart speaking with him, they became greatly agitated and in arousal for her. They said to one another, "Come let us sow our seed in her," and they pursued her. And she, the mother of the living, laughed at them for their witlessness and blindness; and in their clutches she turned into a tree, and left before them her shadowy reflection resembling herself. (89: 15-25)"

This passage demonstrates the imaginal sophistication of Gnostic vision. Gnostics seers discerned the Archons attempt to inseminate Eve — to interfere in the genetics of the human species, if you will — but they also observed that the attempt was a failure. The metamorphosis of Eve into a tree recalls the Greek myth of Daphne who turned into a laurel. (This parallel shows that Gnostic cosmo-mythology was not a fluke, but a system of visionary knowledge deeply rooted in the indigenous mind of pre-Christian Europe.) For Gnostics, the visions they beheld in altered states were empirically true and could be tested. By doing so, they were able to develop extraordinary insight into the superhuman worlds, the activities of the gods, the relation of humanity to alien species, and the long-term experience of the human species.

The above scenario describes how the Archons fail to capture Eve, yet they somehow engage her shadow, a mere reflection. This implies that although the Archons cannot access our genetic structure, they may affect or distort our image of woman, of the Feminine, and in that sense they really can succeed in defiling Eve. They may distort our sense of our own genetic make-up.

As it so often does, Gnostic insight into cosmic order challenges us to understand what is happening in our own minds. Is there some way in which we humans have defiled the image of woman? For instance, by imposing on women an artificial notion of identity, a falsification of their true nature? If so, we would be regarded by Gnostics as accessory to the rape of  Eve by the Archons. Is there evidence in the world today that we have a distorted view of genetics? If so, this distortion, and the actions that proceed from it, would fully merit being regarded as consequences of the Archons' deviating effect on human behavior.

Enter The Annunaki

The above passage from The Hypostasis of the Archons calls to mind current scenarios of alien intervention in human genetics. Most theories of the ET breeding program assume that whatever the aliens (usually, the embryonic Grey types are suspect) might choose to do, they can do. But Gnostic seers who applied non-ordinary reasoning to their observations of the Archons reached a different conclusion. In the Gnostic view, it would be a huge error to assume the Archons are doing things they cannot do, for that would give them power over us. Gnostics taught that the main danger we face with the Archons lies less in what they can actually do than in what we falsely believe they can do. Their trump card is deceit (apaton and plane in Greek), especially deceit about the nature and extent of their powers. "For their delight is bitter, and their beauty is depraved. Their pleasure is in deception." (The Apocryphon of John BG 56, 3-7)

Strange as they are, certain elements in the Gnostic mythos of our species may now begin to look familiar. The theme of alien insemination of the human race also occurs in archaic narratives from ancient Sumeria, dating to the third millennium BCE, and it is rampant in contemporary ET/UFO lore. Sumerian accounts describe an alien species called the Annunaki, who are credited with producing the human species by genetic engineering, and also with inaugurating civilization. These narratives are found on cuneiform tablets dating to circa 1800 BCE, but they preserve late redactions of much earlier versions. Apparently, the story about alien intervention is one of the oldest scripts of our species. Many people who follow the ET/UFO debate are aware of the Sumerian accounts of the Annunaki, who are easily equated with modern-day ETs, but there is a total absence of reference to the Gnostic scenario of the Archons in the controversy so far.

The Gnostic account of Archon/Annunaki activities differs on many significant points from what is found in the Sumerian accounts. For one thing, Gnostics did not regard Archons as superior beings who jump-start civilization. Nor did they consider the Archons capable of accessing the human genome (called by them the Anthropos), although they did grant some role for Archontic activity in our physical evolution. This point is extremely difficult to clarify, however... By far the most striking difference between the Sumerian and Gnostic accounts is that the former contain no inkling of the Sophia mythos and no explanation of how the Archons, alias Annunaki, originated. This is a considerable lacuna, to say the least. (And so, the deceit of the Archons, they could have planted all that Sumerian document just to sway humanity from their path. And of course, sway through those beings who were already swayed, hypnotized, off on the wrong path. And besides, they do use holography to deceive, as well.)

In his elaborate reworking of the Sumerian materials, Zecharia Sitchin describes the Annunaki as a highly advanced non-human species who inhabit the planet Nibiru, an outrider of the solar system with a period of 3600 years. In Sitchin's version of prehistory, the Annunaki came to earth in quest of gold for manufacturing a colloidal suspension needed to stabilize their atmosphere. (For a full account, see Sitchin's last book, The Lost Book of Enki.) Although Sitchin appears to be a legitimate Sumerologist with a profound grasp of ancient languages, no orthodox scholar endorses his scenario for the Annunaki. At worst, it is dismissed as an "ancient astronauts" fantasy dressed up in scholarly robes. I am unable to say whether Sitchin's account of the Annunaki on Nibiru is an accurate rendition of cunieform texts or a fantasy extrapolated in his mind.

Significantly, Sitchin never describes the physical appearance of the Annunaki of either type. One of the great benefits of the Gnostic Archon scenario is that it does provide vivid descriptions of these entities. Is it a coincidence that the embryonic and serpentine Archons described in Gnostic texts present an identical match to the two kinds of ETs most frequently reported in modern times, the Greys and the Reptilians? If the Gnostics got this part of the intervention scenario right, what else did they get right?

Cosmic Cousins

"The same manifestations that created our religious beliefs,
 created our UFO beliefs. A serious look at the Phenomenon
 would cause a revision of our way of looking at religion."
 John Keel, UFO: Operation Trojan Horse

It is startling to find vivid and detailed descriptions of predatory aliens in obscure texts dating from the 4th century CE, but the revelations of Gnosis are nothing if not startling. Some ancient reports of "UFO sightings" do exist, but Gnostic material on the Archons does not merely present "reports." It explains their origins in the cosmic order, their nature (inorganic, imitative, without intentionality), their appearance and tactics, their attitude toward humanity, and more. A more clear and coherent solution to "the Phenomenon" (the ET/UFO enigma) could hardlly be imagined.

The "high strangeness" of the Gnostic Archon material poses a credability issue, of course. We are faced with the choice of believing that these texts represent an accurate account of what Gnostic seers observed in states of non-ordinary reality — that is, a reliable report of genuine parapsychological research achieved by remote viewing, lucid dreaming, clairvoyant observation, and then carefully assessed by non-ordinary reason — or believing that Gnostics were mere fantasists, mystics deluded by their visions, wacko cult weirdos, or worse.

How, then, can we determine if the Gnostic account of the Archons was delusional or if it presents reliable knowledge of alien intervention?

In Sources of the Gaia Mythos, I discussed the indigenous concept of the Dreamtime, the timeless play of creative awareness in the Eternal Now, and its variant, Dreaming:

"When the Dreamtime comes to expression in particular knowledge and behavior, the Aborigines refer to the Dreaming of the creature who embodies that knowledge and exhibits that behavior. For instance, the Kangeroo Dreaming is the summation of the innate knowledge and instinctual behavior of all kangaroos, going back to the Dreamtime ancestors. One could say, in biological terms, it is the enactment of the genome of the Kangeroo species.

 All creatures, organic and inorganic, human and non-human, live and die by the Dreamings that play through them. In the Aboriginal worldview the unique gift of humans to create culture stems from our capacity to remember and retell the Dreaming, not only of our own species, but of others as well. The indigenous belief that the role of humanity is to remember the events of the Dreaming for all creatures accords with the suggestion presented in Sharing the Gaia Mythos: the human species enables a memory-circuit for Gaia."

To apply these ideas to the problem of the Archons, let's recall that we, the human species, are involved in a special way in Gaia's Dreaming, which originates from the trimorphic protennoia, the threefold primal intention of the Aeon Sophia. Our proper boundaries are defined by the earth-moon-sun trinity, and our wisdom endowment unfolds, given by Sophia, unfolds within the unique conditions of the biosphere, the womb of Gaia. However, there is another Dreaming that leaks into the Earth Dreaming, rather like a wireless message that bleeds through into a conversation in progress on another frequency.

 Something extremely weird is happening on Earth due to a fissure in the human mind, and this fissure in turn arises from an anomaly in the cosmic order:

"The world system we inhabit came about by a mistake. (The Gospel of Philip, NHC II, 3, 75.1)"

The magical journey of awareness in which we co-evolve with Gaia's Dreaming is deviated or distorted by an alien influence, so the Gnostics taught. On this recondite point they seem to have agreed with the Yaqui shaman don Juan, who said to Carlos Castaneda, "Human beings are on a journey of awareness, which has been momentarily interrupted by extraneous forces."

Everything we learn about the Archons teaches us something crucial about ourselves.